Bringing Brandon Ingram back to the Lakers could indeed be a transformative move, but it comes with challenges and considerations for both sides. Here’s a breakdown of the scenario:
Why Ingram Makes Sense for the Lakers
1. Scoring Versatility: Ingram’s ability to create his own shot, operate as a secondary playmaker, and score efficiently from all three levels would relieve pressure on LeBron James and Anthony Davis.
2. Fit with the Lakers’ Core: At 6’8″, Ingram’s length and skill set fit perfectly into Darvin Ham’s system, offering a reliable scoring option alongside LeBron and AD.
3. Timeline Alignment: While still in his prime at 26, Ingram bridges the gap between the Lakers’ current championship aspirations and their need to build for the post-LeBron era.
What the Lakers Would Give Up
– Austin Reaves: A fan favorite and rising star, Reaves’ playmaking and shooting have made him indispensable, but acquiring a player of Ingram’s caliber may justify the sacrifice.
– Rui Hachimura: A strong forward who has proven himself in the playoffs, Hachimura adds depth and versatility, making him a valuable trade chip.
– Jalen Hood-Schifino: The Lakers’ 2023 first-round pick, Hood-Schifino, has potential but is still unproven.
– Christian Wood: His inclusion would be for salary-matching purposes, though his offensive skill set might appeal to the Pelicans.
Why the Pelicans Might Consider It
1. Injury Concerns with Ingram: While talented, Ingram has struggled with injuries, and the Pelicans might prefer a deeper, more balanced roster around Zion Williamson and CJ McCollum.
2. Expiring Contract: If the Pelicans are worried about losing Ingram for nothing in free agency, this trade ensures they get young, controllable assets in return.
3. Fit of Incoming Players: Reaves and Hachimura could complement Zion and McCollum well, offering shooting, defense, and playoff experience.
Challenges
– Competition for Ingram: Other teams with more draft capital (e.g., Thunder, Knicks) could outbid the Lakers with offers featuring multiple first-round picks.
– Chemistry Risks: Trading Reaves and Hachimura could disrupt the chemistry the Lakers built last season, especially given Reaves’ growth.
– Leverage Concerns: The Lakers may not have the draft picks or young stars to make the most competitive offer unless the Pelicans prioritize immediate contributors.
Verdict
If the Lakers believe Brandon Ingram is the missing piece to secure another championship, they should explore this deal. However, they’ll need to weigh the short-term benefits against the long-term cost of losing young, ascending players like Reaves.
The Pelicans, meanwhile, would need to assess whether the Lakers’ offer provides enough value compared to potential alternatives.
